-
The Silver Lining of the UK Insolvency Code
Nr. | Chapter | Page. |
List of Abbreviations | 5 | |
Introduction | 6 | |
1 | Insolvency Law in the UK | 8 |
1.1 | The history of the UK bankruptcy Law | 8 |
1.2 | Overview of Corporate Insolvency Law in UK | 8 |
1.2.1 | Liquidation | 8 |
1.2.2 | Administration | 9 |
1.2.3 | Receivership | 9 |
1.2.4 | Corporate Voluntary Agreement | 9 |
2 | Characteristics of an efficient Insolvency law | 10 |
2.1 | Characteristics of an efficient insolvency law denoted by scholars | 10 |
2.1.1 | The ex-ante efficiency | 10 |
2.1.2 | The interim efficiency | 11 |
2.1.3 | The ex-post efficiency | 13 |
2.1.4 | The Trade-off | 14 |
2.2 | Characteristics of an efficient insolvency code denoted by the insolvency practitioners | 15 |
2.2.1 | Minimizes costs and reduces duration of the process | 15 |
2.2.2 | Empowers the IP with flexibility and wide range of options to choose | 15 |
2.2.3 | Enables the IP to take action against irresponsible / criminal managers | 16 |
2.2.4 | Facilitates communication and a balanced agreement with major stakeholders without an expensive interference of minorities | 16 |
3 | Methodology | 17 |
4 | Analysis of the UK insolvency system | 19 |
4.1 | Eliminating inefficient companies while rescuing the efficient ones | 19 |
4.1.1 | Scholars‟ perspective | 19 |
4.1.2 | Insolvency Practitioners` perspective | 20 |
4.1.3 | Authors‟ critical evaluation | 21 |
4.2 | Allowing flexible problem solving to reach time and cost efficiency | 21 |
4.2.1 | Scholars‟ perspective | 21 |
4.2.2 | Perspective of insolvency practitioners | 23 |
4.2.3 | Authors‟ critical evaluation | 25 |
4.3 | Limiting value destroying incentives | 27 |
4.3.1 | Scholars‟ point of view | 27 |
4.3.2 | Insolvency practitioners` perspective | 29 |
4.3.3 | Authors‟ critical evaluation | 29 |
4.4 | Summary of the analysis | 30 |
5 | Powwow Water Company: The Case Study | 31 |
5.1 | Background | 31 |
5.2 | Preserving promising enterprises | 32 |
5.3 | Analysis of Insolvency Costs | 33 |
THE SILVER LINING OF THE UK INSOLVENCY CODE | 4 | |
5.4 | Preventing possible frauds | 35 |
6 | Conclusions | 38 |
7 | The Bankruptcy Law in Lithuania | 38 |
7.1 | Liquidation | 39 |
7.2 | Administration | 39 |
7.3 | Insolvent firms during the credit crisis in Lithuania | 39 |
7.3.1 | Eliminating inefficient companies | 39 |
7.3.2 | Time and cost efficiency | 40 |
7.3.3 | Limits value-destroying incentives | 40 |
7.4 | Main findings | 41 |
References | 43 | |
Appendix 1 | 47 |
The poor economic situation during the last few years (2008-2010) significantly affected development of the economy of the United Kingdom forcing more firms to default on their debt and leave the market (The Insolvency Service, 2011). The growth in the number of insolvent companies made the efficiency of the UK insolvency system an important object of debates.
However, since the efficiency of the insolvency law is hard measure, there haven‟t been many attempts from the scholars‟ side to evaluate it. Actually, the last thorough analysis of the efficiency of insolvency code in UK was made in 1996 by Julian Franks et al. Because a long time has passed without any updated review the authors chose to fill this blank area. In particular, the authors decided to answer such research question - How efficient is the UK Insolvency code?
As efficiency itself is not definable straightforwardly, authors made a qualitative research looking for benchmarks for evaluation of the efficiency of the law. At first, authors‟ covered the materials explaining the insolvency law in the UK, then turned to studies of scholars expressing their analysis about the efficiency of the law and its enforcement. In order to grasp implications of the latest changes in the law, authors acquainted themselves with opinions of practitioners expressed in magazines specializing in insolvency issues. Finally, in order to get practical valuation of the system, authors distributed a qualitative survey among insolvency practitioners in the UK. More than 350 e-mails were sent to IPs (Insolvency practitioners) asking 6 open-ended questions (Appendix 1). Even though the response rate was low, the authors managed to receive 15 essay-type answers.
In answering the main research question authors analysed the Insolvency code in UK based on three denoted benchmarks of efficient system. In the authors opinion, efficient Insolvency law must: (i) eliminate inefficient companies in the ex-ante and ex-post phases, (ii) allow flexible problem solving to reach time and cost efficiency and (iii) limit value destroying incentives in the ex-ante, interim and ex-post phases.…
In this term paper the authors evaluate the efficiency of the UK Insolvency law. Authors have sorted out criteria for efficiency evaluation grounding on responses of the survey addressed to UK insolvency practitioners, as well as criteria discussed by scholars. Three main benchmarks for evaluating an insolvency law were selected. As a result, an efficient insolvency law was considered as the one that 1) eliminates inefficient companies, 2) allows flexible problem solving to reach time and cost efficiency and 3) limits value destroying incentives. After evaluation of the current UK insolvency system, the authors concluded that the system is moderately efficient, still lacking some legal solutions for ex-ante underinvestment problem and reorganization possibilities for smaller companies that have higher relative burden due to high fees for insolvency practitioners.
- Banking Services in Russia: Theory and Fact
- Inflation: Causes and Consequences (inflācija)
- The Silver Lining of the UK Insolvency Code
-
You can quickly add any paper to your favourite. Cool!Banking Services in Russia: Theory and Fact
Research Papers for university17
Evaluated! -
Inflation: Causes and Consequences (inflācija)
Research Papers for university8
-
Latvia’s Cooperation with the World Bank
Research Papers for university14
Evaluated! -
State Revenue Service Riga Regional Office
Research Papers for university7
-
The Banking System in Latvia
Research Papers for university13