Add Papers Marked0
Paper checked off!

Marked works

Viewed0

Viewed works

Shopping Cart0
Paper added to shopping cart!

Shopping Cart

Register Now

internet library
Atlants.lv library
FAQ
2,49 € Add to cart
Add to Wish List
Want cheaper?
ID number:307888
 
Evaluation:
Published: 01.12.1996.
Language: English
Level: Secondary school
Literature: n/a
References: Not used
Extract

Basically Northern would be found negligent for checking its sidewalks 3 times a day because the court would compare the cost of avoiding the accident altogether which would be by checking the sidewalks 9 times a day, Xa.
Using the Limited Information Incremental Learned Hand Standard, a court would look at whether the victim was taking her optimal level of precautions. What can be asked is was the victim wearing appropriate footwear, maybe whether she was running, skipping, injured previously, basically does Ms. Sophomore meet her standard of care. So if Ms. Sophomore does, then yes Northern would be negligent and vice versa.

Author's comment
Work pack:
GREAT DEAL buying in a pack your savings −3,48 €
Work pack Nr. 1258749
Load more similar papers

Atlants

Choose Authorization Method

Email & Password

Email & Password

Wrong e-mail adress or password!
Log In

Forgot your password?

Draugiem.pase
Facebook

Not registered yet?

Register and redeem free papers!

To receive free papers from Atlants.com it is necessary to register. It's quick and will only take a few seconds.

If you have already registered, simply to access the free content.

Cancel Register