Add Papers Marked0
Paper checked off!

Marked works

Viewed0

Viewed works

Shopping Cart0
Paper added to shopping cart!

Shopping Cart

Register Now

internet library
Atlants.lv library
FAQ
3,99 € Add to cart
Add to Wish List
Want cheaper?
ID number:944249
 
Evaluation:
Published: 03.01.2004.
Language: English
Level: Secondary school
Literature: n/a
References: Not used
Extract

CONCLUSION
All three methodological approaches involve safeguards to regulate objectivity.
This is not the same as objectivism. Each has its own "norms for
proceeding with a particular form of inquiry in a rational manner."
However, because of the orientation of each theory, the end results
will vary.
Based upon these difference, critical theory does not seem to be a theory that should be adopted by sociologists. It belongs more in the realm of politics and legislation. Critical theory in that
context could take advantage of scientific inquiry by both positivistic
and interpretive sociologists to make determinations about social change.
If indeed critical theorist are to be involved in sociological study, full disclosure of prejudices and objectives would be needed for any inquiry to be beneficial and trustworthy. Postpositivism remains
the best approach for observing the exteriors of society.

Work pack:
GREAT DEAL buying in a pack your savings −5,98 €
Work pack Nr. 1276727
Load more similar papers

Atlants

Choose Authorization Method

Email & Password

Email & Password

Wrong e-mail adress or password!
Log In

Forgot your password?

Draugiem.pase
Facebook

Not registered yet?

Register and redeem free papers!

To receive free papers from Atlants.com it is necessary to register. It's quick and will only take a few seconds.

If you have already registered, simply to access the free content.

Cancel Register