Add Papers Marked0
Paper checked off!

Marked works

Viewed0

Viewed works

Shopping Cart0
Paper added to shopping cart!

Shopping Cart

Register Now

internet library
Atlants.lv library
FAQ
7,49 € Add to cart
Add to Wish List
Want cheaper?
ID number:735355
 
Evaluation:
Published: 14.04.2016.
Language: English
Level: College/University
Literature: 56 units
References: Not used
Table of contents
Nr. Chapter  Page.
1.  Introduction    3
1.1.  Subject Area    4
1.2.  Internship/Case Company Description    5
1.2.1.  AAA Diamond Rating System    6
1.2.2.  Five Passion Points    7
1.3.  Problem Area    9
1.4.  Problem Statements    11
2.  Theory    12
2.1.  Electronic Word-of-Mouth (eWOM)    12
2.1.1.  Beginning and development    12
2.1.2.  Motivations considering eWOM    16
2.2.  Social Exchange Theory    25
3.  Methodology    27
3.1.  Project Design    27
3.2.  Research Design    29
3.3.  Research Approach    31
3.4.  Methodological Choice    31
3.5.  Research strategy    31
3.6.  Time Horizon    33
3.7.  Methods of Data Collection    33
3.8.  Overall credibility of the research    34
  Reliability    34
  Validity    35
  Generalizability    36
3.9.  Scope and Limitations    37
4.  Data collection    38
4.1.  Primary Data    38
4.2.  Secondary data    43
5.  Empirical Analysis    45
  Year: 2015    45
5.1.  Primary Data    45
5.1.1.  Semi-structured Interviews    45
5.1.2.  Questionnaire    46
5.1.2.  Analysis    49
6.  Discussion    52
7.  Conclusion    57
  Future Perspectives    57
8.  References    59
9.  List of Appendixes    63
Extract

7. Conclusion
It is not certain whether there is connection between user behavioral types and motivations to write reviews online as I was not able to measure the right variables against one another, thus this question is still unanswered, however, it can be taken for future research.
We did, however, find out how eWOM and Social Exchange theory define the motivations of online review contributors, and we did establish and found through empirical evidence what motivates hotel guests to share their experiences of TripAdvisor. Also, according to Social Exchange theory cost-benefit factor can function as a barrier that can prevent the person to engage in an (review writing) activity despite the motivations and activity level, because if writing a review is too costly and benefits have low value to the person, then he/she will not engage in writing a review. The survey could be repeated in a few samples from different seasons of the year in this way to compare and validate the assumptions.

Future Perspectives
Additional question could be added to the questionnaire in future questionnaires that would help to find out why those respondents, who say that they do not considered writing reviews, do not want to do it? That would imply that the collected data would be of a qualitative kind, and should be coded differently, i.e. by pattern-matching method, for example.
For future perspectives looking focusing on TripAdvisor alone - it is possible to question the reliability and trustworthiness of anonymous content created there. TripAdvisor does not require to confirm the users’ identity to be able to write reviews, thus fake reviews as well as fake profiles on TripAdvisor are rather problematic endeavors revealing a contradictory balance act between transparency and necessary control mechanisms.…

Author's comment
Editor's remarks
Work pack:
GREAT DEAL buying in a pack your savings −4,48 €
Work pack Nr. 1353569
Load more similar papers

Atlants

Choose Authorization Method

Email & Password

Email & Password

Wrong e-mail adress or password!
Log In

Forgot your password?

Draugiem.pase
Facebook

Not registered yet?

Register and redeem free papers!

To receive free papers from Atlants.com it is necessary to register. It's quick and will only take a few seconds.

If you have already registered, simply to access the free content.

Cancel Register