"Social Junk" and "Social Dynamite"
"Problem populations are defined in terms if their threat and costs to capitalist relations of production." (Spitzer 503) In other words people are judged by how or what they contribute to society. "Social junk" can be defined as people that don't contribute to society but rather in take. For example senior citizens, handicapped and the mentally retarded. Spitzer defines "social junk" as a costly but relatively harmless burden to society. (504)
In contrary to "social junk" there's another group of social deviants called "social dynamite", this group consist of strikers, demonstrators…
Enter an email address where the link will be sent:
Link to paper: