Add Papers Marked0
Paper checked off!

Marked works


Viewed works

Shopping Cart0
Paper added to shopping cart!

Shopping Cart

Register Now

internet library library
4,49 € Add to cart
Add to Wish List
Want cheaper?
ID number:325441
Published: 01.02.2016.
Language: English
Level: College/University
Literature: 19 units
References: Used
Table of contents
Nr. Chapter  Page.
  Introduction    1
  Literature review    2
  Methodology    2
  General information about the terms of providing fast credits    3
1.  Demand    3
  Customer segment    3
  Intertemporal choice    4
  Income Elasticity    5
  Price Elasticity    6
2.  Supply    7
  Hidden information    7
  Barriers to entry and number of firms    8
  Stackelberg model    8
  Bertrand Model    9
  Strategic marketing and advertisement    11
3.  Regulations    12
  Reasons for regulations    12
  Economic ways of regulations for fast loan industry    13
  Law restrictions    15
  Conclusion    16
  References    17
  Appendix    20

The market of fast loans definitely needs some regulation because currently it has economic profits which are obtained from people who are so poor that are not able to return their debts. This means that the activity of fast loan companies increases income inequality: the poor become even poorer and the rich become richer. This may have negative effects such as alcoholism, increasing crime rate, more homeless people, and disunion of the whole society. If no restrictions are made by the government, the number of pay-day loan companies will increase, because there are real examples of firms who make annual profit larger than LVL 5 million while the annual license costs only LVL 10,000. New companies, as well as the old ones, will attract customers by different marketing campaigns and keep providing misleading information about the actual annual interest rate.
The market structure of fast loan market evolved from Stackelberg oligopoly. When the number of firms increased the firms started to behave so as to get customers from the competitors. As a result the interest rates went down till the level of marginal costs. Therefore, there is no point to impose pmax for the interest rate because the market has already reached Pareto efficient point with no deadweight loss. The government needs to impose another type of pmax which would prevent low-income population taking such loans from getting in a debt trap. The best options to take control of the situation would be to improve conditions of prolonging the rollover period or to set the price ceiling for fines for delayed payments. This will directly cut economic profits of fast loan companies, as well as prevent new companies from entry and new consumers from getting into a debt trap.

Author's comment
Editor's remarks
Load more similar papers


Choose Authorization Method

Email & Password

Email & Password

Wrong e-mail adress or password!
Log In

Forgot your password?


Not registered yet?

Register and redeem free papers!

To receive free papers from it is necessary to register. It's quick and will only take a few seconds.

If you have already registered, simply to access the free content.

Cancel Register