Add Papers Marked0
Paper checked off!

Marked works

Viewed0

Viewed works

Shopping Cart0
Paper added to shopping cart!

Shopping Cart

Register Now

internet library
Atlants.lv library
FAQ
5,49 € Add to cart
Add to Wish List
Want cheaper?
ID number:163966
 
Author:
Evaluation:
Published: 24.01.2012.
Language: English
Level: College/University
Literature: 6 units
References: Not used
Time period viewed: 2000 - 2010 years
Extract

7. Conclusions
In as small economies as in Baltic states it is essential to have healthy financial markets in order to have the benefits of investment, savings and capital gain. In this article we look at the three Baltic financial markets and try to find out what kind of condition they are in. We explore the liquidity and information efficiency side of the markets, compare them among the countries and see how the trends have developed over time period of 2005- 2010.
We find that the liquidity measures- Euro volume, bid/ask spread and ILLIQ ratios-, indicate that the most liquid market of all three Baltic exchanges is OMX Tallinn, and by far the worst is OMX Riga. From the point of view of information efficiency we can see that in all these stock markets the stocks are slightly correlated with the lagged market returns. OMX Tallinn shows significant consistency of low or no correlation and is best off in comparison with both neighbour countries. Observing the correlation over time gives us hope that the situation is correcting itself and the markets are moving closer to being information efficient.
One of controversies is the designated market makers that were operating in the Baltic stock markets. The market makers are not operating in Baltic countries anymore, with the exception of a few stocks in OMX Vilnius. Our results show that the market maker impact on the information efficiency or liquidity is inconclusive. The stocks do perform better under market makers, but the same stocks perform well also after the market makers had discontinued the operations with that stock. This leads us to think that either the market makers really had a significant impact on the stock performance or that the well performing stocks attracted market makers that operated with them for a period of time.

Author's comment
Load more similar papers

Atlants

Choose Authorization Method

Email & Password

Email & Password

Wrong e-mail adress or password!
Log In

Forgot your password?

Draugiem.pase
Facebook

Not registered yet?

Register and redeem free papers!

To receive free papers from Atlants.com it is necessary to register. It's quick and will only take a few seconds.

If you have already registered, simply to access the free content.

Cancel Register