Thus, the consequences of the financial (2008 – present), migration (2015 – present) and virus crisis (2020 – present) in every possible way, they contribute to the rise of ideological dogmas and political practices of Euroscepticism, which carries out, although unspoken, but noticeable division into a grouping of eurofederalists who clearly support the continuation of greater integration, followed by the formation of a United Europe, and Eurosceptics who want to either maintain the current state of integration, or reverse it, where the dominant role will again be played by the governments of national states, rather than supranational institutions. It can be confidently asserted that the current rate of “fragmentation”, “fragmentation” and the overall confrontation between the two perspectives under a single supranational structure sooner or later lead to further aggravation of contradictions both politically and in the public sphere that accompanied the economic downturn, may become a determinant of the
occurrence of structural and even national divisions in the European Union. In light of recent events, namely Britain's exit from the EU, as well as its future without Foggy Albion, it will be appropriate to finish the work with the words of British Prime Minister Winston Churchill: “The absence of Britain deranges the balance of Europe. I am all for a reconciliation between France and Germany, and for receiving Germany back into the European family, but this
implies, as I have always insisted, that Britain and France should in the main act together so as to be able to deal on even terms with Germany, which is so much stronger than France alone. Without Britain, the coal and steel pool in Western Europe must naturally tend to be dominated
by Germany, who will be the most powerful member”16.
…